Representatives Michael McCaul (R- Texas) and Eliot L. Engel (D- New York) introduced the United States–Northern Triangle Enhanced Engagement Act, or H.R. 2615, on May 9, 2019. The bill seeks to address the root causes of migration from the three Northern Triangle countries – El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras.
It would provide irrevocable foreign aid for fiscal year (FY) 2020 to the Northern Triangle nations, which are collectively the most common countries of origin of migrants currently arriving at the U.S. Southern Border, and set conditions for assistance extended to these countries’ governments. Also, it would direct U.S. officials to encourage economic growth and development, combat corruption, strengthen democratic institutions and improve security conditions in the region.
seekers with a credible fear of persecution cannot get a bond hearing On April 16, 2019, the Attorney General issued a decision in Matter
of M-S-, 27 I&N Dec. 509 (A.G. 2019), in which he overruled the Board
of Immigration Appeals decision in Matter of X-K-, 23 I&N Dec. 731
(BIA 2005), and concluded that all aliens subject to expedited removal
(including those encountered between the ports-of-entry and in the interior of
the United States), who are referred for full removal proceedings under section
240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) after being found to have a
credible fear are ineligible for release on bond.
seekers with a credible fear of persecution can get a bond
hearing On July 2, 2019, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of
Washington issued a nationwide preliminary injunction in Padilla v. ICE,
No. 18-928, 2019 WL 2766720 (W.D. Wash. July 2, 2019), ordering the Department
of Justice’s Executive Office of Immigration Review (EOIR) to conduct bond
hearings within seven (7) days of a bond hearing request by a class member, and
to release such aliens if a bond hearing is not conducted within seven (7)
days. The class of aliens to whom the preliminary injunction applies includes:
“All detained asylum seekers who entered the United States without
inspection, were initially subject to expedited removal proceedings under [INA
§ 235(b)], were determined to have a credible fear of persecution, but are not
provided a bond hearing with a verbatim transcript or recording of the hearing
within seven days of requesting a bond hearing.”
seekers with a credible fear of persecution cannotget a bond hearing On Friday, July 12, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
granted a temporary stay of the district court’s preliminary injunction.
seekers with a credible fear of persecution canget a bond hearing On July 22 a federal appeals court ruled that asylum-seekers must
continue to receive bond hearings while the court considers the Trump
administration’s appeal to deny bond hearings with procedural protections to
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the Trump administration’s bid to
arbitrarily jail asylum-seekers without a bond hearing while it considers
whether to keep in place a court decision by a federal district judge in Seattle. The decision
held that the policy of denying bond hearings violated due process. The
district judge also previously held that the government is required to provide
basic procedural protections during the hearings, but the appeals court
declined to require the government to put those protections in place while the
appeal is pending.
As the administration does all it can to harm asylum seekers, the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, American Immigration Council, and the American Civil Liberties Union fight to protect their rights. We thank them.
On July 22, 2019, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced a new policy designed to dramatically expand expedited removal to apply throughout the United States to anyone who has been in the U.S. for less than two years.
The policy will take effect on July
23, 2019, before the public has the opportunity to comment.
Expedited removal gives near-total
authority to immigration officers to apprehend, cast judgment upon, and remove
someone from this country.
Now DHS seeks to apply that power
nationwide, subjecting thousands of people to deportation without a meaningful
chance to collect evidence, consult with an attorney, or come before a judge.
Under the new rule, people will be
denied a fair day in court even if they might qualify for legal relief.
The administration’s answer to the
humanitarian situation at our southern border should be to improve the
immigration court system; instead DHS is eliminating the judges from the
That is not the kind of due process envisioned in the Constitution.
Thanks to the American Immigration Lawyers (AILA) for this information.
Serving our sisters and brothers in the immigrant community